Oklahoma, South Carolina
and Utah may follow Arizona's lead on immigration law
By Michael W. Savage
Thursday, July 8, 2010; A04 - Washington Post
Attention is focused on Arizona and the federal government's challenge to the
state's strict new immigration law, but three other states could adopt similar
legislation next year.
Lawmakers in Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah, which have already taken
steps against illegal immigration, say that Arizona-style measures have a
realistic chance of passing when their legislatures reconvene in 2011.
The Obama administration sued Arizona in federal court Tuesday, charging that the state law
usurps federal authority, would hamper immigration enforcement and would lead to
police harassment of those who have no proof of lawful status. The government
asked that a federal judge stop the law from taking effect July 29.
Legislators in at least 17 other states introduced bills this year similar to
the Arizona law, which allows officers to question anyone they suspect of being
in the country illegally. But most of those measures are not considered likely
to be adopted or signed by governors.
The political climate in Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah, however, improves
the chances that state legislatures there could follow Arizona's lead in 2011.
In 2007, Oklahoma led the way on such laws by adopting legislation that
makes it a felony to knowingly transport or shelter an illegal immigrant. It
also blocked illegal immigrants from obtaining driver's licenses and in-state
tuition.
State Rep. Randy Terrill (R), who sponsored the measure, has expressed a
desire to go beyond the Arizona law when he introduces a bill next year that
would seize property from businesses that knowingly employ illegal immigrants.
Terrill cited the arrest last week of an alleged Mexican drug cartel member
in Oklahoma as evidence that an "Arizona-plus" measure is needed urgently. He
said the effect of Arizona's law has been to push illegal immigrants "straight
down Interstate 40" toward Oklahoma.
Vivek Malhotra, advocacy and policy counsel for the American Civil Liberties
Union, said the administration's decision to sue Arizona could discourage other
states from doing the same. But he also said that similar legislation may be
adopted in 2011.
"After the other border states, it is natural to look at the states that have
enacted the most anti-immigrant laws" before Arizona, Malhotra said. He said he
expected Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah to make the "most vigorous effort" to
enact similar legislation early next year.
Ira Mehlman, spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform,
said he thinks the Obama administration designed the lawsuit against Arizona as
a "shot across the bows" of all states considering similar moves. He said he
doubts, though, that Terrill will be deterred.
"Randy Terrill has made this his issue in Oklahoma and has earned bipartisan support in the past," he said. "He is a determined guy
and he is not going to back down too easily."
In Utah, state Rep. Stephen Sandstrom (R) has been making regular
fact-finding trips to Arizona as he finalizes a draft bill. But, following the
announcement of the federal suit, he said he may consider watering down one of
the Arizona law's most contentious elements.
Under the law, state officers are instructed to check immigration status if
they have a "reasonable suspicion" that a person is in the country illegally.
Sandstrom said his measure may require officers to meet the higher legal
standard of "probable cause" to suspect someone of being undocumented before
checking.
"I don't want people of Hispanic descent to feel my bill is aimed at them,"
he said.
A Utah law that took effect last year made it illegal to harbor or employ
undocumented workers. Gov. Gary R. Herbert (R) has said he expects to sign new
immigration legislation next year and is meeting with all sides to find a way
forward.
South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford (R) touted a comprehensive set of measures
against illegal immigration as the nation's strictest when he signed it into law
in 2008. The far-reaching legislation forced businesses to check the immigration
status of their workers. Harboring and transporting illegal immigrants also
became a state crime. State lawmakers are seeking to build on it and were quick
this year to draw up an Arizona-style bill, introducing it less than a week
after the Arizona measure was signed.
State Sen. Larry Martin (R) said in an interview that an Arizona-type measure
was introduced too late this year. "But I have every expectation a new bill will
be introduced in January," he said. "As long as an officer has a lawful reason
to question someone, and then a suspicion develops [that] they are an
undocumented person, then I think our law enforcement folks ought to be able to
pursue that," he said.